Waterworld: national parks are commonplace on land--so why not marine reserves at sea? It's time to act, says Sara Holden.
New Internationalist › Nbr. 2007, January 2007
Linked as:
New Internationalist › Nbr. 2007, January 2007
Linked as:Extract
Waterworld: national parks are commonplace on land--so why not marine reserves at sea? It's time to act, says Sara Holden.
Imagine a mining company being allowed to chip away at the great rock Uluru in Australia until there was nothing left but a small dusty mound in the desert. Could you conceive of permitting hunting in Yellowstone Park in the US on such a scale that all that remained were a few birds and a handful of straggling bears?
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] It's a ridiculous notion, of course, because both have been afforded comprehensive protection. On land, 10 per cent of our woods, meadows, forests, waterways and even swamps are protected. Measures have been taken to p...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United Kingdom
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Round Up Equestrian Hq Farm & Country News | Letter Worthy Campaign | Marldon Agm On Saturday | Fight Over Waste Plan | Norview Walkers to Take New Path | Shelton Eatery Proceeds to Benefit Umbrella | Logano's Star Continues to Rise; Rookie Phenom Will Compete at Thompson Speedway On Saturday | Women s Basketball Gameday